Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories Path: corax.udac.uu.se!sunic!ericom!eds.ericsson.se!eraotg From: eraotg@eds.ericsson.se Subject: THE NEUTRON INHERENT STRUCTURE Message-ID: <1994Jan19.105550.1@eds.ericsson.se> Lines: 71 Sender: news@ericsson.se Nntp-Posting-Host: era5.ericsson.se Organization: LM Ericsson Data AB, Stockholm, Sweden Date: Wed, 19 Jan 1994 08:55:50 GMT In a book by David Park about the new physics, printed here in Sweden 1965, there is presented a picture over the charge distribution around and into a neutron. I have tried to get this picture commented by particle physicists over a number of years, but never got a satisfactor answer, more than they are saying that the current standard model of quarks explain it. And that is no answer as I see it. The curve looks like as follows : positive axis ! !. ! !p !p !p ! p ! p ! n ! p ! n p small postive dip ! n p ! n n p p ----------------n--n n n n n----------------------------------------- ! n n ! n ! negative dip ! negative axis A short description of the graph: The graph for the proton lies all the time on the positive axis. The neutron graph begins with zero charge on large distance but has a small postitive dip more near. Then the charge goes into a negative dip and at last, very near the neutron core, the graph follows the proton graph. My interpretation of this graph is rather clear. The neutron is a system componded by a proton as core and an electron as orbit, something like the hydrogen system but on a higher energy level. The charge graph for such a system should show up something like that above. If we think the proton is a rather large particle and its "charge" mainly is a surface effect, it motivate the first small positive dip. Then, more near the electron orbit level the negative dip is achieved, and at last very near the proton core, the charge will mainly be the same as for the proton. The electron orbit with a very high velocity, near the velocity of light into into the system, giving the electron an extra mass, appr. 2.5 times more mass than in rest. That motivate the mass difference between the proton and the neutron system (1836.12 compared with 1838.65 electron masses respectively). A further sign on that this model seems to be probable is that a neutron in fact disintegrade into a proton and an electron. The electron leave with a velocity near the ligth velocity. If this model will be correct, then what happens with the quark model for the netron. I think it will collaps. -- Ove Tedenstig, ERA, Borgarfjordsgatan 9, 16480 Kista/Sweden EMAIL: ERAOTG@KIERA.ERICSSON.SE